Comment: Feminist Review Post on The Little Black Book of Grisélidis Réal

Comment on the Feminist Review Post on The Little Black Book of Grisélidis Réal, a newly released translation of Réal’s work log and interviews with journalist Jean-Luc Hennig, translated by Ariana Reines.

The Little Black Book is just what the title says: a compendium of Réal’s experiences with her clients. What Réal accomplished in choosing to compile her work log before her death (I know the word “choice” in this case disturbs you) is to showcase the “humanist science” she practiced. The Little Black Book, thankfully without the typically tedious frills and diatribes of political ideology, is a testament to Réal’s immense capability, her meticulous and inspiring attention, the lonely commitment of our profession: “We know them like the back of our hand. As soon as they get in the door, it’s like we’d made them ourselves.”

Your review bemoans the lack of “arguments about prostitution,” but have you considered that Réal’s whole life was an argument? That every client was a case in point? Or that she was tired of fighting so-called feminists demanding a rebuttal? You say “who cares about the client wanting a finger up his ass,” but who cares about your silly, uninformed, and uncomplicated judgments? As if you can simply allude to the complexities of the sex industry, voice your amorphous “support for sex workers,” and call it a day. Réal took notes on her clients in order to document their incredible and secret idiosyncrasies, to become a better and more skilled worker, to keep a record for her own safety, and to provide a unique and lasting testament to the intricacies, and even mundanities, of working in the sex trade. In the future, please consider asking a sex worker to review a book documenting their profession. With that choice, the Review (which is a wonderful resource), would avoid mistakes like this in the future.



Filed under Uncategorized

3 responses to “Comment: Feminist Review Post on The Little Black Book of Grisélidis Réal

  1. feministreview

    A dialogue cannot be self-contained and requires diversity of thought. FR intends to foster dialogue (that’s one reason why we have over 150 writers with varying perspectives and experiences), and we appreciate your adding your perspective, Will.

    • williamrockwell

      An appeal to diversity in thought is no excuse for an uninformed opinion (I’m speaking of the review here, not the Feminist Review, which is a favorite e-source of mine).

  2. feministreview

    I feel that. I also think one way uninformed opinions turn into informed ones is by putting yourself out there and getting feedback. I’m an idealist in that sense. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s